
![]()
The Institute of Ecosocial Technology implements the discursive-evaluative method developed by Viktor Anatolyevich Chigirev and Petr Ivanovich Yunatskevich. The institute's specialists conduct practical work in the fields of discursive logic and discursive ethics, the ecology of social relations, and address issues of managing social dynamics and public relations, rhizome environments, and improving the ecology of the social environment and nature.
History of the Institute: Established in 2010 as the Institute of Social Technologies of the International Academy of Social Technologies, it was renamed the Institute of Social Technologies of the Academy of Social Technologies in 2018. The Institute's laboratories include the Decriminalization of Public Consciousness Laboratory and the Legal Psychology Laboratory. In February 2020, the Institute was renamed the Institute of Ecosocial Technologies. The Institute's laboratories include an ecolaboratory, a laboratory for sociopathy in the eco-movement, and an online school for personalized training.
Since 2020, the Institute of Ecosocial Technologies has been an independent research organization affiliated with the Academy of Ecosocial Technologies.
The institute's research topics include:
ecosocial technologies, improving the ecology of social relations
restoring the balance of justice in ecosocial systems
procedures for ensuring fair decision-making
prevention of sociopathy in environmental movements
environmental measures to improve social and environmental conditions for human life
cology and politics

Honorary Director of the Institute of Economics and Statistics
Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor, Academician
Colonel Vladimir Vladimirovich Kotov

Director of the Institute of Ecosocial Technologies

Executive Director
Konstantin Sevast'yanovich Makhovitsky
E-mail: Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.
Structure of the Institute of Ecosocial Technologies since 2020

Ecolaboratory
Head of the Laboratory
Academician, Professor of the Institute of Ecosocial Technologies Sergey Vasilyevich Khopersky
Laboratory Staff:
Research Professor
Associate Research Professor
Senior Research Fellow
Ecological Experts
Laboratory Research Topics:
Ecosocial technologies, improving the ecology of social relations
Restoring the balance of justice in ecosocial systems
Procedures for ensuring fair decision-making
Environmental measures to improve social and environmental conditions for human life
Laboratory of Sociopathy
Laboratory Head
Academician, Professor Mikhail Igorevich Sukhanov, Institute of Ecosocial Technologies
Laboratory Staff:
Research Professor
Research Associate Professor
Senior Research Fellow
Experts on Sociopaths
Laboratory Research Topics:
Ecosocial technologies in the prevention of sociopathy
Ecoterrorism and eco-extremism, prevention and protection of society
Ecofanaticism and the protection of society from ecofanatics
Sociopathy prevention procedures in environmental movements
Research on sociopaths and the damage they cause to the environment
Sociopathy (sociopathic disorder) is a mental illness characterized by a disturbance in a person’s thinking and behavior, leading to a systematic violation of social norms.
This mental pathology is characterized by the loss of conscience, nravstvennorality, and empathy for other people. Sociopaths do not respect the rights and feelings of others, manipulate them for their own benefit, and do not feel guilt or responsibility for their actions. The disease leads to serious problems in the personal, professional, and social relationships of people, organizations, states, and nations with whom sociopaths interact. Sociopaths constantly violate laws because they feel uncomfortable with any attempt by others to limit their arbitrariness. They have good social camouflage, using the mental modesty and social cowardice of citizens for their dominance in regulating the distribution of resources and benefits.
Diagnostic criteria for the condition of sociopaths, explained by the loss of conscience, nravstvennorality and empathy for others:
a) communication sphere defect: affectivity, excitability, loss of control over the desire for consumption, entertainment and dominance;
b) the chronic nature of an antinravstvennoral style of behavior, manifested in the desire to harm other people in order to maintain one’s own tyranny, dominance, unbridled consumption, entertainment, and social parasitism;
c) an antinravstvennoral style of behavior, disguised from others, manifests itself in the form of intrigues, conspiracies to cause harm and violate the laws and nravstvennorality of society, inciting mutual hatred and pitting people against each other in social situations;
d) the above-mentioned manifestations always arise in childhood or adolescence as induced states caused by imitation of specific sociopaths in the family, educational and professional environments;
d) sociopathic disorder results in significant harm to all individuals and organizations that encounter sociopaths;
e) the disorder is accompanied by a significant deterioration in the spiritual and material condition of persons who have entered into a relationship with a sociopath, deprofessionalization, and stupefaction of specialists; it is expressed in the imitation of professional activity, loss of a sense of duty and personal responsibility to society and the state.
To make a diagnosis, at least three criteria must be determined:
G1. An indication that the characteristic and constant types of internal experiences and behavior of the individual as a whole deviate significantly from the nravstvennoral norm specified by nravstvennoral rule III-C: the individual causes harm to others (-C2) and to the environment (-C3). Such a deviation must be manifested in more than one of the following areas:
1) in the cognitive sphere, there is a negative way of thinking about the people around and the environment, hatred of other people and fear of them, compensation for this fear through manipulation, seizure of power, resources, money, with the aim of depriving others of the opportunity to resist the tyranny of sociopaths;
2) in various situations (secret conspiracies, intrigues) negative emotions of sociopaths are manifested: anger, hatred, envy, irritation, remorse of greed towards others;
3) there is no control over drives and satisfaction of basic needs for food, consumption, entertainment, dominance; there are attempts to seize power in the personal and public spheres;
4) relationships with others and the manner of resolving interpersonal situations are of the nature of exploitation, humiliation, robbery and other forms of causing social harm.
G2. Deviations of this kind appear all the more symptomatic if they are sophisticated in nature and disguised as socially important goals and popular slogans that cannot be reduced to individual situations.
G3. They have an adverse effect on the social environment.
Personality disorder is characterized by a gross discrepancy between behavior and prevailing social norms. At the same time, it is characterized by the presence of general diagnostic criteria for personality disorder on a number of points:
a) loss of conscience, heartless indifference to the feelings of others;
b) a gross and persistent attitude of irresponsibility and disregard for social rules and responsibilities;
c) inability to maintain relationships in the absence of difficulties in their establishment, failure to comply with any agreements with people, organizations, society and the state;
d) extremely low ability to withstand frustration (a mental state caused by failure to satisfy needs), as well as a low threshold for the discharge of aggression, including violence;
d) inability to experience guilt and to benefit from life experience, including such forms of it as punishment;
e) a tendency to blame others for everything and everywhere and to put forward plausible explanations for one’s destructive behavior, leading to conflict with society, the state, and the laws (“everyone betrayed me,” “deceived me,” “set me up,” and other similar justifications);
g) the presence of constant irritability, bitterness, conflict;
c) disruption of behavioral norms in childhood and adolescence, subsequent difficulties in learning and superficiality of knowledge, lack of professional skills, compensated by verbosity with the use of unusual words and terms reflecting amateurism;
i) the sociopath's disregard for ethical norms and rules, usually explained by the fact that society and the state have allegedly caused him harm and now he is thus free to choose any means and methods to achieve his goals. In this case, the choice of means and methods is of a criminal, antinravstvennoral nature.
Technology of prevention of sociopathy
To prevent sociopathy, the technology of forming teams at all levels of state administration and public self-government is used. In the team, sociopathic manifestations are minimized.
A collective is a social group in which a nravstvennoral atmosphere has been formed, characterized by the following features:
internal unity of ideas, goals, objectives;
joint mode of activity;
mutual assistance and support for each other according to the principle of “one for all and all for one”;
self-government, where each member of the team plays the role of an executor when solving one problem, and a leader when solving another problem;
the opportunity for each member of the team to gain authority in the form of general recognition of social and professional suitability for the position or role held;
friendship, calmness and confidence in the future of each member of the collective;
constructive behavior of collective members, ensuring their mental and physical health;
a sense of pride in belonging to a friendship, calmness and confidence in the future of each member of the collective;
joint discussion and adoption of management decisions.
Collective (educational, labor, service, professional, managerial, business and others) are formed by the heads of state authorities and public self-government in all spheres of life of society and the state.
Regulation of collective relations is carried out in accordance with the principles of voluntariness, equality of rights and obligations, resolution of intra-collective issues through general discussion and assessment, joint decision-making, by mutual consent. The priority of nravstvennoral education and self-education of members of the collective, concern for their well-being and professional development, ensuring priority protection of the rights and interests of young and experienced members of the collective, veterans of labor and service are observed.
The collective has the right to discuss, evaluate and improve decisions aimed at fulfilling the tasks assigned to it. The rights of citizens in the team may be limited based on the decision of the head of the organization that formed the collective, only to the extent that this is necessary for the purpose of protecting the nravstvennorality, health, rights and legitimate interests of other teams and other citizens.
Prevention and suppression of the spread of destructive ideology is carried out in groups.
Signs of a destructive ideology:
selfish motives and aspirations;
priority of the material over the spiritual;
hedonism, parasitism andirresponsibility.
In educational, professional and management teams, measures are taken to develop in students, employees and managers the necessary socially important qualities for successful socialization and professional activity.
Socially important personal qualities, for the formation of which the heads of organizations with their teams and self-governing bodies of teams bear equal responsibility:
nravstvennoral thinking is a special attitude of thinking and behavior that allows one not to harm oneself, others, or the environment; it is formed with the help of other citizens and organizations that constantly correct a person’s behavior and self-esteem;
a sense of duty and personal responsibility for the task assigned;
family spirit – a sense of belonging to a strong family (a stable union between a man and a woman), pride in one’s family and ancestors, which is manifested in the ability not to harm one’s family members and to create for them, to preserve historical memory and the continuity of generations;
the priority of the spiritual over the material, expressed in the predominance of nravstvennoral ideas in regulating human behavior over material stimulation of this behavior;
conscience is a person’s ability to critically evaluate their actions, thoughts, desires, to recognize and experience their inconsistency with proper behavior;
justice is a human feeling that arises in response to the nravstvennoral behavior of other people, in which actions, thoughts and words are united and correspond to people’s ideas about proper and nravstvennoral behavior;
creative work is a human activity during which material and non-material goods are created for other people. It provides positive feedback when consuming the goods created;
honor – a person’s possession of a number of nravstvennoral and psychological qualities that are assessed by other people as qualities worthy of respect, forming the reputation of such a person; dishonor – the loss of such qualities, the destruction of a person’s reputation as a result of his antinravstvennoral actions;
healthy lifestyle, implementation of three provisions of the nravstvennoral rule of three C's:
do not harm yourself with thought, word, deed, and create for yourself with thought, word, deed;
do not harm other people with thought, word, deed, and create for other people with thought, word, deed;
do not harm the environment with thought, word, deed and create for the environment with thought, word, deed.
Persons holding leadership positions in the public authority system must have the following knowledge and skills to manage a collective:
personal example of nravstvennoral behavior and responsible attitude to the assigned task, priority of the spiritual over the material in the behavior of the leader;
the leader personally observes the nravstvennoral rule of the three Cs: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed;
in managing subordinates, uses the discursive-evaluative method: a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions;
the team selects supporters of the idea of a nravstvennoral path in order to be united and invincible;
all decisions are submitted for general discussion and evaluation;
all members of the collective participate in the discussion, evaluation, joint adoption, implementation and control of the implementation of the decision taken;
the team regularly sums up the results of the implementation of decisions made;
a general assessment is given to each member of the team and management who took part in the implementation of the previously adopted decision;
new tasks are set, supported by all members of the collective;
The training and education of personnel, as well as their professional use, are carried out within the team and through the collective.
Technology of formation and provision of team activities:
formulation, discussion and general assessment by team members of ideas, goals and objectives of joint activities (educational, professional, managerial);
acceptance by all of the ideas, goals and objectives of joint activities;
training in joint (collective) action to achieve intended goals and solve set tasks;
the practice of mutual assistance and support for each other based on the principle of “one for all and all for one”;
self-management: each member of the team is assigned several roles of leader and performer of various tasks;
regular general (collective) assessment of each member for his social and professional compliance with the social or professional position he occupies;
holding events aimed at establishing friendly relations between collective members;
care for each member of the collective, so that there is confidence in the nravstvennoral present and future;
constructive behavior of collective members, ensuring their mental and physical health;
rewarding and encouraging collective members to create a sense of pride in belonging to a given collective;
joint discussion, evaluation, adoption and implementation of educational, professional, and management decisions.
Psychological and psychiatric support
public administration and public self-government
In order to protect state authorities and public self-government from the penetration of sociopaths, psychopaths and mentally modest individuals capable of acting on the basis of hedonistic or parasitic motives, psychological and psychiatric support for state administration and public self-government is provided.
Psychological and psychiatric support for public administration and public self-government consists of training relevant specialists who will be subsequently involved in identifying and preventing sociopathy, psychopathies, and mental modesty in government bodies and public self-government.
When selecting personnel for government bodies and public self-government, candidates must undergo diagnostics for sociopathy, psychopathy, and mental modesty.
When civil servants, representatives of public and private organizations, and public figures carry out their professional activities, measures are taken annually to diagnose their deprofessionalization and sociopathization. Based on the results of such measures, a personnel decision is made to rotate persons whose psyche is destroyed by sociopathic and psychopathic manifestations and burdened with mental modesty.
Diagnostics of deprofessionalization is carried out by experts possessing the relevant professional knowledge. Subjects who have discovered the main sign of deprofessionalization – amateurism, are sent for advanced training or a decision is made on rotation of personnel who do not correspond to the professional or social positions they hold.
Identification and removal of sociopaths, psychopaths, and mentally modest individuals from government bodies and public self-government is the main condition for ensuring global security and protecting the rights and freedoms of citizens. This procedure is called the "social filter".
Without social filtering of state authorities and public self-government bodies, cleansing from sociopaths, psychopaths, mentally modest persons, no development and normal, healthy future is possible. Leaders should remember that the main source of harm to society is always sociopaths, psychopaths, and persons with mental modesty. The personal safety of each leader of a state authority (division) and public self-government body depends on their timely removal.
Preventing the penetration of sociopaths, psychopaths and mentally modest individuals into all socially significant positions in society and the state, international and private organizations is the main way to prevent a lethal war.
In regulating social relations, the states of the world community apply the basic provisions of the new ethics: a person should not harm a person, all socially significant decisions are widely discussed and implemented jointly with citizens.
Insults to individuals, humiliation of human dignity, aggressive statements and calls for murder of people are unacceptable in public places and information resources. Demonstration of harm to a person by a person is unethical, antinravstvennoral. States around the world help citizens to become nravstvennoral so that such citizens can protect their Fatherland from the main threat: sociopaths, psychopaths and ACGs (administrative criminal groups) created with their participation.

Ecoethics Laboratory
Laboratory Head
Associate Professor of the Institute of Ecosocial Technologies Oleg Anatolyevich Mazur
Laboratory Staff:
Research Professor
Associate Research Professor
Senior Research Fellow
Ecosocial Technologies and Policies
Laboratory Research Topics:
New Global Environmental Ethics
Discursive-Evaluative Method as an Ecosocial Technology
Global Ethical Regulation
Social-Evaluative Networks of Future Generations
GLOBAL ETHICS
AS THE BASIS OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE
Before talking about global governance, we need to define global ethics. This is what the military-scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich claims. It offers a new ethic for the way out of the crisis of all world systems, connected with global ecology: man should not harm man and the environment.
The vocabulary of heads of state, transnational and national corporations, and international organizations includes the utilitarian ethic of seeking profitable deals.
However, relationships, including trade relationships, built on pragmatism alone (utilitarianism, monetarism, the primacy of the material over the spiritual) lead to the collapse of all deals. The scale of the crisis in business relations begins to grow when sociopaths (people without conscience and compassion) and psychopaths (people with obvious character defects, because of which they harm everyone around them) sneak into politics. They destroy all international treaties and agreements, do not fulfill their obligations, betray and sell each other out.
The global market is losing stability. Investment portfolios can no longer be insured. Each market participant must now find ways to insure their contracts and build new logistics. The stability of the economy has been reduced. The unpredictability of the behavior of global market regulators is growing. The global financial market began to need ethical regulation on a new basis. Mistrust has arisen towards a number of global currencies. Former allies have begun to harm each other.
Those who propose to behave according to the rules, change these rules themselves every day. Therefore, an initiative has arisen to form a new mechanism of global governance. However, without defining its ethical foundations, such a mechanism will not be created. It will be talked down, since it is impossible to restore trust in each other without forming joint intangible assets built on the basis of a global ethical principle: a person should not harm a person and the environment. Also, global governance requires a technology built on a method adequate to the object of governance.
In order to create a mechanism of global governance, to restore trust between former allies in the West and East, North and South, to stabilize the global economy, world and national markets, the military-scientific school of V.A. Chigirev and P.I. Yunatskevich has developed and offers global ethics. It includes a global ecological principle and a discursive-evaluative method.
Global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.
Discourse-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass assessment when discussing socially significant decisions.
Eight billion citizens of our planet Earth experience an acute shortage of justice, they want to establish moral order so that each person is protected from harm, social parasitism. The facts of mass violation of human rights and freedoms, the aggravation of inequality and the elimination of the middle class have shown everyone the imperfection of laws, courts, law enforcement practice. The existing system of international and national law can and should be supplemented with new ethics, which is based on the global ecological principle and the ecological nravstvennoral rule of three C (III-C) that follows from it:
C1- Don't harm yourself!
C2- Don't harm your neighbor!! Otherwise your neighbor will harm you.
C3- Don't harm the environment!!! Otherwise the environment will harm you.
In order not to harm yourself, you need not to harm other people and the environment - that is, to become ecological. Do not harm yourself - here and now - and you will ensure the ecology of the planet, your home and social environment. This guarantees a bright future for yourself and your descendants.
Ecology is about not causing harm to oneself, other people, and the environment. Others determine the life path of each person. They evaluate and discuss any citizen or (and) boss. If others establish that this specific citizen or (and) boss causes harm, then there is NO trust in him. Therefore, a saboteur who has lost trust immediately becomes an object of influence of others. This influence can be different, dangerous and even deadly. To avoid harm from others, a saboteur can save himself by becoming more ecological, that is, harmless to the environment and other people. For self-preservation of himself and the environment, it is important for him to stop harming others, so as not to harm himself in the end!!!
There is no bright, happy future for everyone. Everyone feels it – both rich and poor. The situation of everyone in the situation of loss of the ethical regulator, moral crisis is unstable. Harm can suddenly happen to anyone. Accumulation of money only attracts the negative social energy of the masses. Everything is possible here: lethal redistribution of property; robbery according to all the rules of jurisprudence; reprisals against descendants; desecration of treasures and wealth of entire generations of wealthy families, clans and families.
All big bosses are in a semantic, existential dead end. They are tired of constant intrigues, their own tyranny, they are fed up with their impunity, they feel the inevitability of their own catastrophe and the violation of the integrity of their physical shell. The way out of the existential dead end is the new global ethics - technology (GET).
Therefore, the need for a universal unifying idea and technology for its implementation has come. And such a global ideology-technology has been created – global ethics: people do not harm each other and the environment; they protect each other and the environment.
Global ethics is Nravstvennoi Path of Humanity. Both the poor and the rich, both the servant and the boss are ready to follow it, without harming each other; creating for each other.
If you have not followed the ecological moral path, then there will be few who will come to see you off on your final journey.
The individual, personal brake that holds one back from the desire to follow the ecological moral path and save oneself from harm caused by others are the following subjective reasons:
1) greed (remorse of greed);
2) envy of the one walking ahead on the ecological moral path;
3) mental modesty.
They (greed, envy, intellectual modesty) are the reasons for causing harm to oneself, neighbors, and the environment.
They are also the reasons for harmful social parasitic, as well as sociopathic and psychopathic behavior. We propose the main condition for the onset of global peace - a new global ethics - technology.
Global Ethics - Technology (GET)
Global Ethics Technology (GET) includes the idea of non-harm by man to man and the environment, freely accepted and shared by the majority of the population of the Earth; and the associated procedure for measuring the environmental friendliness of the leaders of global management systems on planet Earth.
Environmental friendliness is measured in the process of environmental assessment. As a result, each leader of the global management system receives an individual ecoindices (EI), which is constantly adjusted in the process of discursive practices.
Individual ecoindices are used by citizens all over the world to protect the environment and ensure the safety of social relations.
Foundations of the new global ethics - technology (GET):
Global ecological principle (GEP): a person should not harm himself, other people and the environment.
Global Ethical Nravstvennoral Principle (GENP): a person must behave in such a way as not to cause harm to himself, other people and the environment.
Discursive-evaluative method (DEM) is a method of regulating social relations based on group expert and mass evaluation when discussing socially significant decisions.
Nravstvennoral rule III-C: do not harm yourself (C1), your neighbors (C2), or your environment (C3) by thought, word, or deed; create for yourself, your neighbors, and your environment by thought, word, and deed.
The technology of new global ethics is based on the discursive-evaluative method (DEM), which consists of organizing broad participation of citizens in the discussion and evaluation of socially significant decisions from the positions of GEP, GENP, III-C.
Global governance, market and peace
Global governance, the market and the world will become stable when everyone begins to follow the moral rule: create - do no harm.
There is harm - there is no trust. And when there is no trust, there is no governance, no market, and no peace. Therefore, the basis of global governance, the foundation of the global market and peace, public peace, the stability of socio-economic relations, world and national currencies, human health is the social process described by the formula:
DEM + III-C = Global Management, Market and Peace
Any capital strives for safe development. This is impossible without global ethics. The demand for safety, insurance of investment projects and portfolios is guaranteed only by global ethics – technology (GET):
DEM + GET (III-C)
Organizing and participating in this creative process will allow the process of global governance to be given an ecological, nravstvennoral, coordinating principle. This is the only way to stabilize the global market and restore trust in world currencies, establish moral and legal order, stop bloody wars, stop the killing of man by man in the present, and thus guarantee a bright Future for everyone.
Global ethics will stabilize the world monetary system and logistics. Sustainable growth of all economies will begin, especially in underdeveloped countries. The well-being of the world's population will rise. The rich will become richer, the poor will stop living in poverty. Conflicts will move from the lethal plane to a non-lethal humane confrontation. Instead of hitting the opponent on the skull, they will hit his arguments. Everything will be regulated by general discussion and assessment from the position of the global ecological principle: man must not harm man and the environment.
Distance learning
Academic Education
Bachelor's Degree
Major: Ecosocial Technologies
Master's Degree
Major: Training Specialists in Ecosocial Technologies
Doctoral Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
Major: Ethics
Applications for ecosocial support, as well as individual or group counseling, are accepted by email:
Этот адрес электронной почты защищён от спам-ботов. У вас должен быть включен JavaScript для просмотра.




